Main Article Content

Abstract

Project success factors relate to the risk of uncertainty in a job that experiences additions or deletions from the original scope of work according to the contract, thereby changing the entire contract value and even the completion time of the job. This research aims to analyze the influence of soundness of business and workforce, planning and control, and safety performance on the success of construction projects. Using a quantitative explanatory methodology, the research utilized Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS), used in this work via SmartPLS software. A structured survey was used to gather information from 100 contractors in Surabaya. The findings reveal a positive relationship between the soundness of the business and the workforce and planning, control, and safety performance to project success in construction projects.

Keywords

Soundness Of Business and Workforce Planning and Control Safety Performance Project Success

Article Details

How to Cite
Suyoso, A. L. A. . (2024). Project Success Factors Analysis Business Construction . Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 4(2), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v4i2.795

References

  1. Albino V & Garavelli A.C. (1998). A Neural Network Application to Subcontractor Rating in Construction Firms. International Journal of Project Management,16(1),9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00007-0.
  2. Al-Momani A.H. (2000). Construction Delay: A Quantitative Analysis. International. Journal Project. Management., 18(1), 51–59. DOI:10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00060-X
  3. Ayalew dkk. (2016). Assessment on Performance and Challenges of Ethiopian Construction Industry. Quest Journals Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2(11),01-11.
  4. Aydın, H., Okul, B., Ayvaz, B., Kuşakçı, A. O., Kağıtçıoğlu, S. (2016). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Teknikleri Ile Alt Yüklenici Seçimi: İnşaat Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, Bartın Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(14), 29-44.
  5. Bingöl, B.N., Polat G. (2017). Risk Analysis In The Subcontractor Selection Process For International Construction Projects. International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management, 1(1). 1285-1292.
  6. Erdoğan, O., Topraklı Y. (2019). Türkiye Inşaat Endüstrisinde Risk Tabanlı Alt Yüklenici Seçiminde TOPSIS Metodolojisi Ve Değerlendirmesi. Bayburt Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi,2(1). 1-10.
  7. Hanna, A. S., Camlic, R., Peterson, P. A., dan Nordheim, E. V. (2002). Quantitative Definition of Project Impacted By Change Orders. Journal. Construction. Engineering Management, 128(1), 57–64. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(57)
  8. Hartmann, A.; Caerteling, J. (2010). Subcontractor Procurement In Construction: The Interplay Of Price And Trust, Supply Chain Management. An International Journal of Project Management, 15(5), 354–362.’
  9. Hatush, Z. & Skitmore, M. (1998). Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Utility Theory: An Additive Model. Journal of Building and Environment, 33(2-3),105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4
  10. Karaman & Koray. (2022). Effect of Sub-Contractor Selection on Construction Project Success in Turkey. Teknik Dergi,2(14),12105-12118.
  11. Khan, K. I. A., R. Flanagan, dan S. L. Lu. (2016). Managing Information Complexity Using System Dynamics On Construction Projects. Construction Management Economy. 34(3): 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193 .2016.1190026.
  12. Kozlovská, M., and Struková, Z. (2013). Integration of Occupational Safety to Contractors` or Subcontractors` Performance Evaluation in Construction Projects. Journal of Civil Engineering, 8(1), 13-24.
  13. Lew YL, Hassim S, Muniandy R, Hua L.T. (2018). Structural Equation Modelling for Subcontracting Practice. Malaysia Chapter, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(7),835-860.
  14. Mbachu, J. (2008). Conceptual Framework For The Assessment Of Subcontractors’ Eligibility And Performance In The Construction Industry. Construction Management and Economics,26(5), 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190801918730.
  15. Ng, S. T.; Luu, C. D. T. (2008). Modeling Subcontractor Registration Decisions Through Case-based Reasoning Approach. Automation in Construction, 17(7), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.02.015
  16. Okoroh, M. I. &Torrance, V. B. (2010). A Model For Subcontractor Selection in Refurbishment Projects. Construction Management and Economics,17(3), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371529
  17. Piasny, J. & Paslawski, J. (2015). Selection of Subcontractors as The Quality Improvement Tool in Housing Construction. Procedia Engineering, 122(2),274-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.036
  18. Polat G., Kaplan B, Bingol B.N. (2015). Subcontractor Selection Using Genetic Algorithm. Procedia Engineering,123(2), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.081
  19. Ulubeyli, S. (2008). Uluslararası Inşaat Projelerinde Alt Yüklenici Seçimi Için Bulanık Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Modeli, PhD Thesis (in Turkish), İstanbul University.
  20. Wang, D.; Yung, K. L.; Ip, W. H. (2001). A Heuristic Genetic Algorithm For Subcontractor Selection In A Global Manufacturing Environment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part C. Applications and Reviews, 31(2),189–198.