Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the campaign strategies and the role of social networks in shaping electoral success in the 2024 legislative elections in Kolaka Regency, Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach with a case study design, the research reveals that successful candidates primarily relied on community-based campaign strategies, emphasizing door-to-door outreach, participation in religious and cultural events, and symbolic acts of social solidarity. Rather than formal party platforms, candidates' presence and emotional closeness with voters influenced voter behavior. The findings demonstrate that social networks, particularly kinship ties, religious groups such as Majelis Taklim, and youth communities served as critical channels for political mobilization. Candidates embedded in these networks gained greater visibility and legitimacy, which was essential for electoral trust. In semi-urban areas like Watubangga and Tanggetada, digital platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram were also used strategically, especially among young voters. However, the effectiveness of digital communication was deeply rooted in offline relational capital. The study also underscores the persistence of patron-client relations in local electoral dynamics. Voter support was frequently driven by past personal assistance, social reciprocity, and community recognition rather than policy considerations. Patronage was not always transactional; it often took the form of moral obligations and long-term social investment. Overall, the research highlights that effective electoral strategies in Kolaka are built on message delivery, sustained social engagement, and embeddedness in local relational structures.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. NUS Press.
- Berenschot, W. (2018). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
- Cahyati, D. D., & Lopo, Y. H. L. (2019). Daily patronage politics: A village chief's route to power. PCD Journal, 7(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.51737
- Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
- Fatimah, S., Kushandajani, K., Fitriyah, F., & Adnan, M. (2023). Gotong Royong culture as an alternative to political funding in local elections. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i1.16816
- Lim, M. (2020). Digital campaigning and political mobilization in Indonesia: The power of personalism and platforms. In R. Tapsell (Ed.), Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and divergence (pp. 65–83). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
- Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
- Mujani, S., & Liddle, R. W. (2010). Personalization of politics in Indonesia: Presidential elections in 2004 and 2009. Southeast Asian Studies, 48(2), 203–228.
- Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
- Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron‑client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. University of Hawaiʽi Press.
- Shin, J. H. (2015). Voter demands for patronage: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004197
- Suryana, N. (2014). Apresiasi masyarakat terhadap debat calon presiden/wakil presiden tahun 2014… Jurnal Penelitian Pers dan Komunikasi Pembangunan, 18(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.46426/jp2kp.v18i1.10
- Tomsa, D., & Setijadi, C. (2018). New forms of political activism in Indonesia: Redefining the nexus between electoral and movement politics. Asian Survey, 58(3), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.3.557
- Warburton, E., Muhtadi, B., Aspinall, E., & Fossati, D. (2021). When does class matter? Unequal representation in Indonesian legislatures. Third World Quarterly, 42(6), 1252–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1882297
References
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. NUS Press.
Berenschot, W. (2018). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Cahyati, D. D., & Lopo, Y. H. L. (2019). Daily patronage politics: A village chief's route to power. PCD Journal, 7(2), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.22146/pcd.51737
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Fatimah, S., Kushandajani, K., Fitriyah, F., & Adnan, M. (2023). Gotong Royong culture as an alternative to political funding in local elections. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v10i1.16816
Lim, M. (2020). Digital campaigning and political mobilization in Indonesia: The power of personalism and platforms. In R. Tapsell (Ed.), Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and divergence (pp. 65–83). ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mujani, S., & Liddle, R. W. (2010). Personalization of politics in Indonesia: Presidential elections in 2004 and 2009. Southeast Asian Studies, 48(2), 203–228.
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108595841
Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron‑client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. University of Hawaiʽi Press.
Shin, J. H. (2015). Voter demands for patronage: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004197
Suryana, N. (2014). Apresiasi masyarakat terhadap debat calon presiden/wakil presiden tahun 2014… Jurnal Penelitian Pers dan Komunikasi Pembangunan, 18(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.46426/jp2kp.v18i1.10
Tomsa, D., & Setijadi, C. (2018). New forms of political activism in Indonesia: Redefining the nexus between electoral and movement politics. Asian Survey, 58(3), 557–581. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2018.58.3.557
Warburton, E., Muhtadi, B., Aspinall, E., & Fossati, D. (2021). When does class matter? Unequal representation in Indonesian legislatures. Third World Quarterly, 42(6), 1252–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1882297