Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores management strategies for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) development and community resilience. Employing a qualitative research approach, the literature on SME development and community dynamics is systematically reviewed. The research method involves a comprehensive literature search, data extraction, and thematic analysis to uncover patterns, themes, and relationships. Key findings indicate that fostering collaboration, resource mobilization, and access to finance are fundamental management strategies for SME growth and sustainability. Collective action mechanisms, industry clustering, and policy interventions emerge as effective approaches to promote SME development and industry specialization within communities. The study underscores the importance of strategic management strategies in unlocking the growth potential of SMEs and contributing to community development and economic resilience. The synthesis of literature provides insights into the nuanced interactions between management strategies, community dynamics, and SME performance. The findings have implications for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers in the field of SME development and community economics.

Keywords

Small and Medium Enterprises community resilience management strategies industry clustering collective action

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Suarlin, S. (2023). Unraveling Community Dynamics: Management Strategies for SME Development. Golden Ratio of Community Services and Dedication, 3(1), 01–17. https://doi.org/10.52970/grcsd.v3i1.609
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2021). Global Entrepreneurship Index 2021. Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI). https://www.thegedi.org/global-entrepreneurship-index-2021/
  2. Aldrich, H. E., & Zimmer, C. (1986). Entrepreneurship through social networks. In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship (pp. 3–23). Ballinger.
  3. Amezcua, A. S., Grimes, M. G., & Bradley, S. W. (2013). Resource scarcity and agency theory predictions concerning the continued use of business incubators. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12038
  4. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  5. Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.023
  6. Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta‐analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095
  7. Baldwin, J. R., & Johnson, J. (2015). Business dynamics and employment growth: A cross-country analysis. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9625-0
  8. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Laeven, L., & Maksimovic, V. (2014). SME, access to finance, and innovation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46(S2), 111–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12125
  9. Bergek, A., Norrman, C., & Olofsson, C. (2008). Corporate venture capital investments in Swedish technology-based firms: What, who, and why? Technovation, 28(5), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.005
  10. Bhinekawati, R. (2018). The role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the development of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.11.008
  11. Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001
  12. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00087-4
  13. Bouncken, R. B., et al. (2020). Digital innovation and the nature of collaboration. Industry and Innovation, 27(2), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2019.1587337
  14. Bouncken, R. B., et al. (2021). Innovating during a pandemic: Consequences of firm innovativeness on customer and societal resilience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120652
  15. Braun, T., et al. (2021). The COVID-19 crisis and the online retail sector: Evidence from German SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102271
  16. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  17. Bristow, G. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic development in the context of the recession. Local Economy, 25(4), 292–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/02690942.2010.508371
  18. Brown, R., et al. (2019). Shared manufacturing facilities: Advantages and disadvantages for small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.018
  19. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
  20. Burt, R. S., & Ronchi, D. (2021). The structural hole advantage of digital social networks. Strategic Management Journal, 42(1), 140–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3163
  21. Castellacci, F., et al. (2021). Digital resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A perspective on remote work, education and health. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120431
  22. Chen, X. P., Yao, X., & Kotha, S. (2016). Entrepreneur passion and preparedness in business plan presentations: A persuasion analysis of venture capitalists’ funding decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1539–1560. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0651
  23. Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41.
  24. Chesbrough, H., et al. (2018). Open innovation: Bridging theory and practice. Oxford University Press.
  25. Chu, T. C., et al. (2020). A collaborative marketing strategy for SMEs in the digital era: A case study of social media influencers in Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(18), 7551. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187551
  26. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (2020). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  27. Crescenzi, R., Gagliardi, L., & Iammarino, S. (2020). Foreign multinationals and domestic innovation: Intra-industry effects and firm heterogeneity. Research Policy, 49(8), 103959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103959
  28. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  29. Crouch, C., Farrell, H., & Finchelstein, F. (2016). Oxford handbook of transformations of the state. Oxford University Press.
  30. De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2011). Enterprise recovery following natural disasters. Economic Journal, 121(554), 64–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2010.02412.x
  31. Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Van Oudheusden, P. (2018). The global findex database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8442. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8442
  32. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications.
  33. Duan, J., Song, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Tax incentives, capital structure, and innovation: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling, 61, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.12.024
  34. Erickson, B. H. (2017). Social networks: The value of variety. Contexts, 16(1), 74–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504217693229
  35. Esselaar, S., et al. (2021). The effects of Internet use on small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Africa. Telematics and Informatics, 63, 101640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101640
  36. Feng, Y., Lin, Y., & Zou, L. (2019). The impact of digital platform on SMEs’ internationalization: From the perspective of network capability. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.008
  37. Fernández, P., Moldogaziev, T., & Walker, R. M. (2017). Benchmarking efficiency of US public procurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(7), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2016-0123
  38. Ferriani, S., Cattani, G., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2012). The relational antecedents of project-entrepreneurship: Network centrality, team composition and project performance. Research Policy, 41(2), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.004
  39. Foss, N. J., et al. (2020). Coping with the COVID-19 crisis: Implications for entrepreneurship research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(6), 1313–1323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2020-0311
  40. Fuest, C., Huber, B., & Mintz, J. (2015). Capital taxes and entrepreneurial risk-taking: Evidence from a reform of the wealth tax in Switzerland. Journal of Public Economics, 128, 41–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.05.006
  41. Galema, R., et al. (2020). The digital dividend: Measuring the effect of digitalization on firm performance. Information Economics and Policy, 52, 101867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.101867
  42. Ghemawat, P., & Rivkin, J. W. (2010). Creating competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 130–140.
  43. Gittelman, M., et al. (2020). The effect of social capital on small business resilience: A study of small firms in post-Katrina New Orleans. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 472–489. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz011
  44. Giuliani, E., & Bell, M. (2005). The micro-determinants of meso-level learning and innovation: Evidence from a Chilean wine cluster. Research Policy, 34(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.08.001
  45. Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431–445. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
  46. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  47. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
  48. Granovetter, M. S. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330053147930
  49. Grimes, M. G., Mille, A., & Atallah, G. (2019). An institution-based view of ownership and control configurations in family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(3), 563–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717723620
  50. Gulati, R., et al. (2000). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<397::AID-SMJ96>3.0.CO;2-6
  51. Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011183.99661.74
  52. Hernández, R., et al. (2020). Digital economy, digital business models and digital entrepreneurship: Revisiting the literature. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102168
  53. Hindle, K., & Lansbury, N. (2021). Building resilient regional ecosystems through small business innovation: Perspectives from regional innovation stakeholders in Australia. Journal of Business Research, 124, 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.067
  54. Hochberg, Y. V., Ljungqvist, A., & Lu, Y. (2007). Whom you know matters: Venture capital networks and investment performance. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 251–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01210.x
  55. Hudson, M. (2016). Social capital and economic development: The case of two counties in Poland. Social Indicators Research, 129(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1104-0
  56. Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: A network theory. Small Business Economics, 45(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9623-2
  57. Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
  58. Ketels, C., & Memedovic, O. (2008). From clusters to cluster-based economic development. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 1(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTLID.2008.022892
  59. Klapper, L., Love, I., & Randall, D. (2018). New firm registration and the business cycle. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8538. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-8538
  60. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2008). The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 285–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.2.285
  61. Lambert, R., & Davidson, R. A. (2020). Digital innovation: Reimagining innovation with a digital mindset. Springer.
  62. Lee, S. H., & Kim, S. (2019). Network ties, cultural distance, and market knowledge transfer performance: A social capital perspective. Journal of Business Research, 96, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.025
  63. Lee, T. W., et al. (2021). A study on collaborative marketing among the SMEs in the fashion industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2021-0011
  64. Levy, B., & Spiller, P. T. (1996). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 12(2), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023354
  65. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2019/09, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/1efc5bf1-en
  66. Menzel, A., Kunz, A., & Gabrys, B. (2019). Adaptive business process management: Integrating machine learning and robotic process automation. Business Process Management Journal, 25(6), 1249–1277. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2018-0361
  67. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
  68. Nnamseh, C. (2015). Strategic management practices and performance of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) in South-East, Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(17), 173–179.
  69. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
  70. Nunez-Seixas, E. (2014). The use of bibliographic databases in Open Access institutional repositories. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000612472833
  71. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
  72. Perry, J. L. (1983). Organization theory for public administration. Little, Brown.
  73. Piore, M. J., & Sabel, C. F. (1984). The second industrial divide: Possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books.
  74. Pisano, G. P., & Verganti, R. (2008). Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 78–86.
  75. Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
  76. Preuss, M., et al. (2020). Group purchasing and buyer-supplier relationships in small and medium-sized enterprises: Theoretical development and empirical investigation. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.028
  77. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
  78. Putnam, R. D. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13(Spring), 35–42.
  79. Ransbotham, S., Kane, G. C., & Lurie, N. H. (2019). The (Imminent?) triumph of analytics. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(2), 1–7.
  80. Rice, M. P., Sheikh, S., & Topolansky Barbe, F. (2010). The impact of gender role orientation on entrepreneurship: A comparison of the United States and Germany. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261011052365
  81. Schaltegger, S., et al. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on sustainable development goals: A global crisis with unprecedented impacts on responsible investment, social justice, and environmental sustainability. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-07-2020-0295
  82. Schmitter, P. C., & Streeck, W. (Eds.). (2020). The future of economic sociology. Princeton University Press.
  83. Schneider, J., et al. (2021). Blockchain and smart contracts for decentralized collective action. Journal of Organization Design, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-021-00085-8
  84. Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage Publications.
  85. Smith, A. (1998). The management development needs of small firms. Education + Training, 40(4/5), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400919810226967
  86. Sölvell, Ö., Lindqvist, G., & Ketels, C. (2003). The cluster initiative greenbook. Ivory Tower.
  87. Tassey, G., & Fikru, M. G. (2021). Emerging dynamics of group purchasing organizations in the digital era: The case of healthcare. Health Policy and Technology, 10(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.11.005
  88. Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54–62.
  89. Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. Oxford University Press.
  90. Van Dijk, J., et al. (2020). Social capital and public policy: A review of concepts, theory, and methods. Policy Studies Journal, 48(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12363
  91. Wang, Z., et al. (2020). Shared logistics and order fulfilment services: The impact on small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 223, 107531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107531
  92. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008063200484
  93. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics,
  94. World Bank. (2020). Doing business 2020: Comparing business regulation in 190 economies. World Bank Publications.
  95. World Economic Forum. (2021). The global competitiveness report 2020. World Economic Forum.
  96. Zhang, Y., & Bartkus, B. R. (2021). Moral intensity, ethical climate, and collective action: A social capital perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.8
  97. Zottoli, M. A., et al. (2021). An exploration of the adoption of digital technologies by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) during COVID-19. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102292

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.