Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes the role of four dimensions of dynamic capabilities: Perceptual Ability, Analytical Competence, Unification Expertise, and Harmonization Capacity in encouraging Sustainable Innovation Performance in SMEs in Sidoarjo Regency. A quantitative approach with a sample of 121 SMEs showed that Harmonization Capacity had a positive and substantial influence on sustainable innovation performance. In contrast, Analytical Competence and Coordination Capacity showed a significant positive effect. In contrast, Integration Capabilities did not show a significant influence. These findings underscore the importance of the learning process and strategic coordination in increasing the sustainable innovation capacity of Sidoarjo SMEs, with practical implications for the development of supporting policies and strengthening the managerial capabilities of local SMEs.

Keywords

Dynamic Capabilities Sustainable Innovation Performance Sidoarjo SMEs Business Transformation Local Economic Sustainability

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Bima Prasetya, M., Muzdalifah , L., Novie , M., & Sholikhah , A. (2025). Analysis of the Dynamic Capabilities of Sidoarjo SME in Improving the Performance of Sustainable Innovation. Golden Ratio of Marketing and Applied Psychology of Business, 6(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmapb.v6i1.1243
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akenroye, T. O., Owens, J. D., Elbaz, J., & Durowoju, O. A. (2020). Dynamic capabilities for SME participation in public procurement. Business Process Management Journal, 26(4), 857–888. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-10-2019-0447
  2. Akhtar, S., Li, C., Sohu, J. M., Rasool, Y., Hassan, M. I. U., & Bilal, M. (2024). Unlocking green innovation and environmental performance: the mediated moderation of green absorptive capacity and green innovation climate. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 31(3), 4547–4562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31403-w
  3. Al Dhaheri, M. H., Ahmad, S. Z., & Papastathopoulos, A. (2024). Do environmental turbulence, dynamic capabilities, and artificial intelligence force SMEs to be innovative? Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(3), 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100528
  4. Ambarini, L., Trisnawati, N., & Marhalinda. (2024). Product Innovation in Culinary Business MSMEs at Pejuang Morning Market, Bekasi. Journal of IKRAITH-ABDIMAS, 8(1), 258–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37817/ikra-ithabdimas.v8i1
  5. Argote, L. (2024). Knowledge Transfer Within Organizations: Mechanisms, Motivation, and Consideration. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-105424
  6. Arroyabe, M. F., Arranz, C. F. A., Fernandez De Arroyabe, I., & Fernandez de Arroyabe, J. C. (2024). Analyzing AI adoption in European SMEs: A study of digital capabilities, innovation, and external environment. Technology in Society, 79(October), 102733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102733
  7. Barbosa, M. T. J., & Carvalho, M. M. (2024). Absorptive capacity activation triggers: Insights from learning in project epochs of a project-based organization. International Journal of Project Management, 42(6), 102637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102637
  8. Bogodistov, Y., & Schmidt, S. (2024). Affective states and a firm's performance: the mediating role of dynamic managerial capabilities. Baltic Journal of Management, 19(6), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/BJM-09-2023-0352
  9. BPS Sidoarjo Regency. (2024). Central Statistics Agency of Sidoarjo Regency, BPS-Statistics of Sidoarjo Regency. Sec. 41.
  10. Firmansyah, Z. N., & Priyono, A. (2022). The Effect of Supply Chain Integration on Product Innovation Capabilities in MSMEs in Indonesia. Management Select: Journal of Business & Management Students, 01(05), 109–120.
  11. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2020). The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Past Practices and Recommendations for Future Applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
  12. Inayah, N., Emilisa, N., & Mayrisya, Z. N. F. (2024). The Influence of Digital Leadership and Innovative Culture on Innovation Performance Mediated by Digital Innovation in PT Employees. Bank Central Asia Tbk in Central Jakarta. Journal of Social Science, 5(4), 1013–1025. https://doi.org/10.46799/jss.v5i4.868
  13. Jumaroh, D. A., & Suryaningrum, D. H. (2024). Digital Capabilities, Environment, And Business Strategy For MSMEs' Performance In Sidoarjo District. Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting (COSTING), 7(4), 10682–10694. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i4.10937
  14. Kastelli, I., Dimas, P., Stamopoulos, D., & Tsakanikas, A. (2024). Linking Digital Capacity to Innovation Performance: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capacity. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01092-w
  15. Muawanah, C. C., & Pujianto, W. E. (2024). Innovation Capability on Organizational Performance: Dynamic Marketing Capability as a Mediation Variable. Dialectics: Journal of Economics and Social Sciences, 9(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v9i1.3888
  16. Muhammadin, A., Ramli, R., Ridjal, S., Kanto, M., Alam, S., & Idris, H. (2020). Effects of dynamic capability and marketing strategy on the organizational performance of the banking sector in Makassar, Indonesia. Espacio Magazine, 41(24), 26–41. https://www.revistaespacios.com
  17. Novella, P., Sorel, M., Usón, A., Adams, C., Almazán, H., Álvarez, V., Aparicio, B., Aranburu, A. I., Arazi, L., Arnquist, I. J., Ayet, S., Azevedo, C. D. R., Bailey, K., Ballester, F., Benlloch-Rodríguez, J. M., Borges, F. I. G. M., Bounasser, S., Byrnes, N., Cárcel, S., ... Yahlali, N. (2022). In NEXT, the Xe 136 two-neutrino double-β-decay half-life is measured via direct background subtraction. Physical Review C, 105(5). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.055501
  18. Othman, N. (2016). Exploring the Innovative Personality Characteristics among Teachers. International Education Studies, 9(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p1
  19. Pavlou, A., P., Sawy, E., & A., O. (2011). Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239–273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 5915.2010.00287.x
  20. Pennetta, S., Anglani, F., Reaiche, C., & Boyle, S. (2024). Mapping the Field of Entrepreneurial Versus Managerial Abilities: A New Trend of Dynamic Capabilities- A Bibliometric Analysis. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241234718
  21. Pitelis, C. N., Teece, D. J., & Yang, H. (2023). Dynamic Capabilities and MNE Global Strategy: A Systematic Literature Review-Based Novel Conceptual Framework. Journal of Management Studies, Nov. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13021
  22. Pujianto, W. E., Musyaffaah, L., & Supriyadi. (2023). Organizational Justice to Employee Innovative Work Behavior: Mediation Effect of Learning Capacity and Moderation Effect of Blue Ocean Leadership. Greenomics, 5(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.55732/unu.gnk.2022.05.1.8
  23. Putra, I. P., & Setiadi, T. (2024). Promotional Mix Of Gajah Mada Sidoarjo Culinary Center. The Commercium, 8(1), 161–171.
  24. Rauf, F., Wanqiu, W., Naveed, K., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Green R&D investment, ESG reporting, and corporate green innovation performance. PLoS ONE, 19(3 March), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299707
  25. Rinawiyanti, E. D., Lianto, B., & Soeharsono, F. (2017). Study the Relationship of Innovation Capabilities and Innovation Performance of Footwear SMEs in Mojokerto. Ajie, 4(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.20885/ajie.vol4.iss1.art2
  26. Sarwar, Z., Gao, J., & Khan, A. (2024). Nexus of digital platforms, innovation capability, and strategic alignment to enhance innovation performance in the Asia Pacific region: a dynamic capability perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 867–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09879-4
  27. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2012.046944
  28. Taghizadeh, S. K., Rahman, S. A., Nikbin, D., Radomska, M., & Maleki Far, S. (2023). Dynamic capabilities of the SMEs for sustainable innovation performance: role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 11(4), 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-04-2023-0166
  29. Taghizadeh. (2024). National Counterintelligence Strategy - 2024.
  30. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035334995.00014
  31. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
  32. Wijayanti, R., Berliana, N. G., Nadhiroh, I. M., Aminullah, E., Kusnandar, Fizzanty, T., Handayani, T., Rahmaida, R., Laili, N., Kusbiantono, & Handoko, L. T. (2012). The correlation between structural capital and innovation in the Indonesian manufacturing industry. ICIMTR 2012 - 2012 International Conference on Innovation, Management and Technology Research, July, 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTR.2012.6236411
  33. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.6587995
  34. Zahra, S. A., Petricevic, O., & Luo, Y. (2022). Toward an action-based view of dynamic capabilities for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(4), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00487-2
  35. Zhou, S., & May, W. (2024). Interrelationship Between Entrepreneurial Alertness and Intention Among University Students: A Moderated Mediation Model. ECNU Review of Education, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241256355
  36. Zhou, Y., Yang, C., Liu, Z., & Gong, L. (2023). Digital technology adoption and innovation performance: a moderated mediation model. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, May, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2023.2209203