Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of teacher motivation (X1), principal leadership (X2), and teacher competence (X3) on teacher performance (Y). The population taken was 79 people and because the population was less than 100 people, the sample taken was the entire population as a total sample, namely all teachers at SMPN 2 Sungguminasa, and a tool to test data analysis using linear regression. The results of this study stated that partially the motivation variable (XI) showed a value of p = 0.001 <0.05, this means that partially the work motivation variable has a significant influence on the performance of SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa employees. Partially the leadership variable (X2) shows a value of p = 0.000 < 0.05. This means that partially the variable of workability has a significant employee performance and function at SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa. Competence has a significant effect on teacher performance with P = 0.000 < 0.05 with a coefficient value of 0.186. The coefficient shows that the better the level of educators, the better the performance, so the third hypothesis can be concluded that if there is an increase in the level of education and training, it will affect the Performance of the teacher. The variable that has the most dominant influence on teachers at SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa is motivation. Motivation and appreciation can encourage teacher performance. Training education is held under their duties and responsibilities, so that it can run effectively as well as efficiently and will make the teacher's performance level higher.

Keywords

Teacher Motivation Principal Leadership Teacher Competence Teacher Performance

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Amaliah Ma'ruf, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar

 

 

How to Cite
Ma’ruf, A., Puspita Aji, G., & Praswara, S. . (2022). The Influence of Motivation, Leadership, and Competence on Teacher Performance . Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 2(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v2i2.273
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahn, I., Chiu, M. M., & Patrick, H. (2021). Connecting teacher and student motivation: Student-perceived teacher need-supportive practices and student need satisfaction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 64, 101950. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101950
  2. Alghababsheh, M., Abu khader, D. E., Butt, A. S., & Moktadir, M. A. (2022). Business strategy, green supply chain management practices, and financial performance: A nuanced empirical examination. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 134865. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134865
  3. Clayback, K. A., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2021). Exclusionary discipline practices in early childhood settings: A survey of child care directors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 129–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.11.002
  4. Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Adaptive and maladaptive work-related motivation among teachers: A person-centered examination and links with well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 64, 199–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.010
  5. Durnali, M. (2022). ‘Destroying barriers to critical thinking’ to surge the effect of self-leadership skills on electronic learning styles. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101130
  6. Feng, Y. (2023). Do listed companies fulfill their public commitments? Evidence from the stake-raising commitments of Chinese companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77, 101893. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101893
  7. Huang, J., Siu, C. T.-S., & Cheung, H. (2022). Longitudinal relations among teacher-student closeness, cognitive flexibility, intrinsic reading motivation, and reading achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 61, 179–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.07.009
  8. Knudsen, L. S., Skovgaard, T., & Bredahl, T. V. G. (2021). ‘I like it’: Exploring teachers’ motivation for using classroom-based physical activity in Danish public schools from a self-determination perspective. Results from a mixed methods study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103439
  9. Kolomboy, F., Palutturi, S., Rifai, F., Saleh, L. M., Nasrul, & Amiruddin, R. (2021). Leadership style based on the study of multifactor leadership questionnaire in Palu Anutapura hospital. Gaceta Sanitaria, 35, S432–S434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.069
  10. Lazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2021). The relative strength of relations between different facets of teacher motivation and core dimensions of teaching quality in mathematics - A multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101489. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101489
  11. Oukil, A., El-Bouri, A., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Energy-aware job scheduling in a multi-objective production environment – An integrated DEA-OWA model. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 168, 108065. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108065
  12. Parr, A., Gladstone, J., Rosenzweig, E., & Wang, M.-T. (2021). Why do I teach? A mixed-methods study of in-service teachers’ motivations, autonomy-supportive instruction, and emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 98, 103228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103228
  13. Salimi, E. A., Mirian, E. S., & Younesi, J. (2022). Anxiety level of mastery and performance avoid goal oriented EAP learners: The effect of teacher supportive motivational discourse. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101809. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101809
  14. Su, J., Pu, X., Yadav, K., & Subramnaiyan, M. (2022). A physical education teacher motivation from the self-evaluation framework. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 98, 107772. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107772
  15. Tang, J. (2021). CEO self-discipline in power use: A key moderator for the effect of CEO power. European Management Journal, 39(5), 633–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.01.007
  16. Thommen, D., Sieber, V., Grob, U., & Praetorius, A.-K. (2021). Teachers’ motivational profiles and their longitudinal associations with teaching quality. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101514
  17. Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2021). Teacher motivation, quality instruction, and student outcomes: Not a simple path. Learning and Instruction, 76, 101545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101545

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.