Main Article Content

Abstract

The confusion of the five vocational high school students in determining their career direction is divided into three main categories, namely lack of readiness, lack of information, and inconsistent information. Based on the observation results, the five students showed significant hesitation when asked by the intern about their study and career plans, and did not immediately provide answers when asked directly. This study aims to test the effectiveness of reality counseling using the WDEP (wants, doing, evaluating, planning) model in dealing with career decision-making difficulties of grade XII students of SMK PGRI supported by pre-test and post-test. This research is compiled based on a report presented in the form of a scientific article with participants consisting of five grade XII students of SMK PGRI, identities are disguised to maintain confidentiality and research ethics. The reality counseling intervention of the WDEP (wants, doing, evaluating, planning) model includes an understanding of career decision-making. The results of the study showed that when supported by assessment and intervention, the entire series of assessments (observation, CDMDQ questionnaire, FGD, IST–RMIB–16PF psychological test) and group counseling intervention with a Reality approach (WDEP), it can be concluded that five students (AAF, AM, ARK, FDH, and IPH) experienced difficulties in making career decisions in the high category before the intervention. This obstacle is reflected in low psychological readiness, minimal information about themselves and the career world, and the inconsistency of information from the social environment.

Keywords

Reality Counseling WDEP Model Decision Difficulty Career Decision Making Vocational High School Students

Article Details

How to Cite
Alnadya, M., & Meiyuntariningsih, T. (2026). The Effectiveness of WDEP (Wants, Doing, Evaluation, Planning) Reality Counseling Model Career Decision-Making Difficulties in Grade XII Students at PGRI Vocational School. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i3.2139

References

  1. AP2TPI, & HIMPSI. (2024). Surat Keputusan Asosiasi Penyelenggara Pendidikan Tinggi Psikologi Indonesia (AP2TPI) Nomor: 055/AP2TPI/S.E/IX/2024 dan Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia (HIMPSI) Nomor: 045/SK/PP-HIMPSI/VIII/24 tentang Pengesahan Panduan Laporan Kasus Layanan Profesi Psikolog Umum (LPPPU).
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
  3. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742
  4. Christian, A., & Jatmika, D. (2018). Hubungan keterampilan mendengar aktif orang tua dengan keterbukaan komunikasi anak. Jurnal Psikologi Perkembangan, 7(2), 85–97.
  5. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
  6. Darling, N., & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113(3), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.487
  7. Djamaluddin, M., Umar, S. H., La Page, M., & Khatimah, A. K. (2021). Penguatan pola asuh orang tua dalam mengatasi kenakalan remaja di Kelurahan Takomie Kota Ternate. Jurnal PKM: Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 4(5), 500–505
  8. Gati, I., Krausz, M., & Osipow, S. H. (1996). A taxonomy of difficulties in career decision making. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4), 510–526. DOI: 10.1037/0022 0167.43.4.510
  9. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
  10. Hasdayanti, H., Nurhikmah, N., & Thalib, U. (2024). Adaptasi dan validasi Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire (CDMDQ) pada siswa SMK Techno Terapan Makassar. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan dan Konseling, 10(1), 1–12.
  11. Hatimah, I., Sari, P., & Rahmawati, D. (2012). Efektivitas psikoedukasi komunikasi efektif terhadap peningkatan kualitas hubungan orang tua dan remaja. Jurnal Psikologi, 9(1), 45–56.
  12. Kartono, K. (2014). Patologi sosial 2: Kenakalan remaja. RajaGrafindo Persada.
  13. Ma’ruf, M., et al. (2022). Kesulitan pengambilan keputusan karier pada siswa SMK: Peran bimbingan karier sekolah. Jurnal Konseling dan Pengembangan Karir, 7(2), 45–53.
  14. Santrock, J. W. (2018). Adolescence (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education
  15. Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  16. Sonya, A., dkk. (2024). Efektivitas konseling realitas model WDEP terhadap peningkatan pengambilan keputusan karier siswa SMK. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Indonesia, 12(1), 22–30
  17. Yuliani, N. (2018). Efektivitas konseling realitas dalam meningkatkan kematangan karier remaja. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling, 5(2), 99–108.

Similar Articles

<< < 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.