Main Article Content

Abstract

Criminal assault remains one of the most common offenses encountered in society, often triggered by minor disputes that escalate into physical harm. This study aims to investigate the process of handling minor and ordinary assault offenses at the East Medan Police Sector and to analyze the legal distinctions between Article 351, paragraph (1), and Article 352 of the Indonesian Criminal Code. This research employs a normative-empirical method, combining statutory analysis with field data obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation. The findings reveal that differences in determining the severity of injuries often lead to inconsistencies between investigators and prosecutors, primarily due to the absence of clear legal criteria for injury classification. The study also shows that minor assault cases constitute the majority of reports handled, with restorative justice frequently used as a settlement mechanism. Investigators rely heavily on medical reports and victim statements to determine the appropriate article to apply. This research highlights the need for more explicit legal norms regarding injury categories and stronger coordination among law enforcement institutions to ensure consistent and fair handling of assault offenses.

Keywords

Assault Offenses Minor Assault Ordinary Assault Investigation Criminal Code

Article Details

How to Cite
Marpaung, N. T. B., & Debora, D. (2026). Investigation of Minor and Ordinary Assault Offenses: Case Study at Polsek Medan Timur, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i1.1854

References

  1. Andi Hamzah. (2010). Delik Delik Tertentu (Sinar Graf).
  2. Arifullah, A. (2024). A Juridical Study of the Death Penalty from a Human Rights Perspective. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i1.940
  3. Assaad, A. I., Mursyid, M., & Setyaningsih, S. (2021). Judge's Legal Analysis of Murder Offices. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 1(1), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v1i1.116
  4. Ayu Apriani, N., & Hadi Pura, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Saksi Dan Korban Penganiayaan Oleh Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi Dan Korban. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 05(02), 220–242. http://jurnal.saburai.ac.id/index.php/hkm.
  5. Effendi, E. (2024). Settlement of Crime of Light Maltreatment Through a Restorative Justice Approach in the Legal Area of Pekanbaru Police. DELICTUM : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 3(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.35905/delictum.v3i1.9678
  6. Efritadewi, A. (2020). Modul Hukum Pidana (Cetakan 1). UMRAH Press.
  7. Firosyiah, N., & Suyatna, S. (2024). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Mengkualifikasi Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat dalam Praktik Peradilan (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor: 372/Pid.B/2020/PN.Jkt.Utr). Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 5. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i4.2385
  8. Fitroni, N. A., Widodo, E., Studi, P., Ilmu, M., & Hukum, F. (2025). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran. 6(2), 69–78.
  9. Hasibuan, E. S. (2021). Hukum Kepolisian Dan Criminal Policy Dalam Penegakan Hukum (Yayat Sri Hayati (ed.); Ed . 1, Cet.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
  10. Hukum, J., Publik, A., Kasus, S., Nomor, P., Pn, P. B., Fadilah, N., Nurfasyah, N., G, I. F. S., Natasya, M., Styabudi, M. L., Sultan, U., & Tirtayasa, A. (2025). Analisis Kasus Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dari Sudut Pandang Viktimologi Buku II Bab XX Pasal 351 sampai dengan 356 KUHP dengan ancaman mulai dari 2 tahun 8.
  11. Maria Cristy, E., & Zukriadi, D. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindakan Penganiayaan Di Indonesia. Scientia Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.33884/scientiajournal.v6i1.8224
  12. Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revi). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  13. Mulyaningsih, M., & Kadarusman, A. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Umum Terhadap Manajemen Penyidikan Kasus Tindak Pidana Umum Dalam Mewujudkan Kinerja Penyidik Di Satuan Reserse Dan Kriminal Polres Garut. Journal Publik, 13(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.52434/jurnalpublik.v13i2.15
  14. Pangemanan, M. M. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Pasal 351 Kuhp Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 18/PID.B/2024/PN THN). Lex Privatum-Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat, 16(1), 1–23.
  15. Pasaribu. (2025). Hasil Wawancara.
  16. Penganiayaan, K. (2025). 1 2 3 4. 13(3).
  17. Prakoso, D. (1988). Alat Bukti Dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Di Dalam Proses Pidana (Edisi Pert). LIBERTY.
  18. Rande, S., & Asmarani, M. (2025). Breaking the Chain of Violence: A Study of Policy Implementation on Child Protection in Samarinda City, Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(2), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.1228
  19. Renaldy, H. S., & Rosdiana. (2019). Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Implementasi Restorative Justice dalam Resolusi Tindak Pidana Persekusi di Selatan Artikel. Journal Lex Suprema, 1(September).
  20. Sanjaya, A. (2023). Penyelesaian Pidana Penganiayaan Dengan Jalan Damai Antara Pelaku Dan Korban. Jurnal Hukum Dan HAM Wara Sains, 2(05), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i05.352
  21. Sihombing, A. I., & Siregar, H. (2025). Prosecutorial Evidence Efforts in Juvenile Violent Theft Cases: A Case Study at the Medan District Prosecutor's Office. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(4), 835–846. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i4.1797.
  22. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
  23. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
  24. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
  25. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 sebagaiaman yang telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.