Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aimed to explore how social science learning in elementary schools could play a role in building children's social intelligence. By conducting a qualitative approach and literature review, this study examined various concepts, theories, and practices in social science learning that could improve students' social skills. Data was collected by reviewing articles, journals, and relevant books discussing the relationship between social education and children's social intelligence development. The study results indicated that theoretically, social science materials focused on social values, culture, and interactions between individuals in society, and students could gain a deep understanding of the importance of empathy, tolerance, and cooperation in social life. In addition, social science learning could also provide direct experiences that enable students to apply social concepts in their daily lives. This study recommended that the social science curriculum in elementary schools should more fully integrate an approach based on the development of social intelligence to shape students' characters until they are prepared to face future social challenges.

Keywords

Social Intelligent Social Science Learning Elementary School Social Education Children Character

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Marsini, M. (2025). The Role of Social Science to Build Social Awareness Among Elementary School Students. Golden Ratio of Mapping Idea and Literature Format, 5(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.52970/grmilf.v5i2.1634
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Baihaqi, M. (2008). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Lapis PGMI.
  2. Brandmayr, F. (2021). Social science as apologia. European Journal of Social Theory, 24(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431021990965
  3. David, L. (2012). The Social Science of Empire: A Review Essay. Journal of Developing Societies, 28(4), 441–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X12463144
  4. Dupré, J. (2016). Social Science: City Center or Leafy Suburb. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(6), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393116649713
  5. Foucault Welles, B., & Meirelles, I. (2014). Visualizing Computational Social Science: The Multiple Lives of a Complex Image. Science Communication, 37(1), 34–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547014556540
  6. Hamalik, O. (2010). Perencouldaan pengajaran berdasarkan pendekatan sistem. PT Bumi Aksara.
  7. Hasyim, A. (2015). Pembelajaran ilmu pengetahuan sosial berbasis pendidikan karakter. Media Akademi
  8. Matz, J., Brown, P., & Brody, J. G. (2016). Social science–environmental health collaborations: An exciting new direction. NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 26(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048291116664501
  9. Nigel Gilbert, G., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1997). Social Science Microsimulation. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 56(1), 71-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910639705600107
  10. Nurdin, & Mohamad, H. (2012). Belajar dengan pendekatan PAILKEM: Pembelajaran aktif, inovatif, lingkungan, kreatif, efektif, menarik. PT Bumi Aksara.
  11. Nurhadi. (2002). Pendekatan kontekstual (Contextual teaching and learning). Universitas Negeri Malang.
  12. Pagès, J. (1993). Psicología y Didáctica de las ciencias sociales. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 16(62-63), 121-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.1993.10822377
  13. Papadopoulos, D. (2009). Klaus Holzkamp's Critical Social Science. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103537
  14. Purwanto. (2009). Evaluasi hasil belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.
  15. Sapriya (2007). Pengembangan ed di SD. UPI Press.
  16. Savage, T. M., & Armstrong, D. G. (1996). Effective teaching in elementary social studies (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  17. Simangunsong, M. P., & Abidin, Z. (1987). Metodologi IIS (IPS) untuk SPG–SGO–KPG dan guru SD (I). Akademika Pressindo.
  18. Syafril, & Zen, Z. (2017). Dasar-dasar ilmu pendidikan. Kencoulda.
  19. Tissaw, M. (2003). Emancipative Social Science: Theory and Method, Reflexivity and Power, Values and Foundations. Theory & Psychology, 13(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354303013002007
  20. Waizbort, R. (2004). Objectivity in Social Science: Toward a Hermeneutical Evolutionary Theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(1), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103261740
  21. Wallerstein, I. (1996). Social Science and Contemporary Society: The vanishing guarantees of rationality. International Sociology, 11(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858096011001002