Main Article Content

Abstract

The policy of land acquisition for public purposes is an important instrument for supporting national development. Yet in practice, it often generates agrarian conflicts and raises concerns about justice for affected communities. The central issue lies in the gap between the normative objectives of land acquisition policies and their implementation, particularly in ensuring the protection of citizens' rights and the realization of social justice. This study addresses the following research question: How is the implementation of land acquisition policies for public interest evaluated from a social justice perspective? Using a normative legal research method, this study analyses relevant legislation, court decisions, and recent academic literature through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that land acquisition practices remain dominated by administrative and legal-formal orientations, which limit the achievement of substantive justice. Community participation is often procedural rather than meaningful, compensation mechanisms largely emphasize economic valuation, and restorative measures to support post-displacement recovery are insufficiently integrated. The study concludes that land acquisition policies must be reoriented toward a more participatory, equitable, and restorative framework to strengthen policy legitimacy and better safeguard community rights throughout the development process.

Keywords

Land Acquisition Public Interest Social Justice Public Policy Land Law

Article Details

How to Cite
Noor, A., Alamsyah, D., & Fathurrohman, M. F. (2026). Examining Land Rights Expropriation Policies for Public Interest: A Social Justice Perspective in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1976

References

  1. Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., Singh, G. G., & Sumaila, U. R. (2019). Just transformations to sustainability. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13211
  2. Boone, C. (2018). Legal empowerment of people with low incomes through property rights reform. World Development, 105, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.017
  3. Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2018). Land grabbing and social justice. Third World Quarterly, 39(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1363726
  4. Cotula, L. (2019). Land governance and human rights. Land Use Policy, 83, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.001
  5. Deininger, K., Ali, D. A., Holden, S., & Zevenbergen, J. (2019). Land policy reforms and governance. World Bank Research Observer, 34(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lky014
  6. Diana, D., & Aswari, A. (2023). Legal arrangements and remedies for abandoned land: A normative study. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 2(2), Article 293. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v2i2.293
  7. Franco, J. C. (2019). Land rights and governance reforms. Globalisations, 16(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1535188
  8. German, L., Cavane, E., Sitoe, A., & Braga, C. (2019). Private investment as an engine of rural development. Global Environmental Change, 54, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004
  9. Hall, D., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2020). Resistance, acquiescence, or incorporation: An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions "from below." Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1672663
  10. Hall, R., & Scoones, I. (2021). Rethinking land reform and justice. Journal of Agrarian Change, 21(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12398
  11. Hoops, B., & Miller, M. (2019). Livelihood restoration and resettlement outcomes: Evidence from development-induced displacement. World Development, 123, 104610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104610
  12. Iqbal, M. N., Awaluddin, A. R., & Liweng, A. D. T. (2024). Juridical analysis of the concept of state responsibility towards natural disaster victims based on Indonesian Law Number 24 of 2007 on disaster management. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 4(1), Article 847. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v4i1.847
  13. Li, T. M. (2018). After the land grab: Infrastructural violence and the politics of displacement. Development and Change, 49(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12389
  14. Lestrelin, G., et al. (2020). Land, power, and inequality. World Development, 129, 104889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104889
  15. Magsi, H., Torre, A., Liu, Y., & Sheikh, M. J. (2018). Land compensation, resettlement, and justice: Lessons from infrastructure projects. Land Use Policy, 76, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.038
  16. Nguyen, T. T. (2020). Justice in land acquisition compensation: A case study of infrastructure development. Habitat International, 96, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102098
  17. Riswandar, M. R., & Abbas, I. (2023). Information technology in the implementation of land registration activities: The implementation side. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 3(1), Article 298. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v3i1.298
  18. Schlosberg, D. (2019). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Political Studies, 67(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718794487
  19. Scoones, I. (2018). Agrarian change and social justice. Journal of Agrarian Change, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12217
  20. Sikor, T., He, J., & Lestrelin, G. (2017). Property rights and social justice. World Development, 93, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.019
  21. Sikor, T., & Lund, C. (2018). Access and authority: The political economy of property. Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1416402
  22. Temper, L., del Bene, D., & Martínez-Alier, J. (2018). Mapping environmental justice conflicts. Global Environmental Change, 54, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004
  23. Vanclay, F. (2017). Project-induced displacement and resettlement: From impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1271539
  24. Vanclay, F., Hanna, P., & Arts, J. (2021). Social justice in impact assessment: A conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 86, 106478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106478
  25. Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., & Wu, F. (2019). Procedural justice, public participation, and land acquisition. Land Use Policy, 82, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.020
  26. Yntiso, G. (2020). Compensation, displacement, and livelihood restoration. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 55(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620907606
  27. Zoomers, A., et al. (2017). Development corridors and land governance. Third World Quarterly, 38(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2017.1291040