Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study analyzes how viral digital mobilization translated public anger into policy responses in Indonesia through the 2025 #BubarkanDPR and 17+8 Tuntutan Rakyat movements. While #BubarkanDPR (“Disband the House of Representatives”) emerged as a symbolic critique of legislative privilege and accountability deficits, the 17+8 platform converted diffuse online outrage into twenty-five structured reform demands. Using a qualitative case study integrating digital discourse analysis, media triangulation, and legal document review, the research examines the interaction between emotional mobilization, elite response, and constitutional constraints. The findings demonstrate that viral anger operated as political pressure producing three outcomes: institutional concessions, including suspension of housing allowances and transparency commitments; disciplinary sanctions against legislators after controversial remarks; and activation of oversight mechanisms such as ethics reviews and human rights investigations. However, the core demand to dissolve parliament was constitutionally barred under Article 7C of the amended 1945 Constitution, underscoring structural limits. The study argues that in Indonesia’s digital democracy, virality constitutes contingent political legitimacy, capable of triggering short-term accountability but insufficient to transform entrenched power structures.

Keywords

Digital Mobilization Viral Outrage Legislative Accountability Policy Response Indonesia’s Digital Democracy

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Arintyas, A. P. R. D. A., Aristi, S., & Maulana, M. A. (2026). From Hashtag to Policy: Viral Anger and Lawmaking in Indonesia’s Digital Democracy. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 5(2), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1949
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Amaral, I., & Ventura, D. (2025). Digital Youth Activism on Instagram : Racial Justice , Black Feminism , and Literary Mobilization in the Case of Marley Dias. Journalism and Media, 6(2018), 1–16.
  2. ANTARA News. (2025, September 1). Ahmad Sahroni dan Nafa Urbach dinonaktifkan sebagai anggota DPR RI. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/5076677/ahmad-sahroni-dan-nafa-urbach-dinonaktifkan-sebagai-anggota-dpr-ri
  3. Azhari, T. B., Ridho, M. A., & Rosyad, S. (2023). The Viral Phenomenon on Social Media Is a New Legal Norm-No Viral, No Justice. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 3(4), 277–282.
  4. Bederson, V., Chernysheva, L., & Semenov, A. (2025). Local Activism Goes Digital in Authoritarian Setting : The Use of Digital Platforms in Place-Based Conflicts in Russia. Social Media + Society, 13(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251344455
  5. Bijak Memantau. (2025, September 5). Komnas HAM bentuk tim investigasi kasus Affan Kurniawan dan kerusuhan 25 Agustus. https://bijakmemantau.id/tuntutan-178
  6. Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
  7. Crockett, M. J. (2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(11), 769–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0213-3
  8. Déri, A., & Szabó, A. (2025). Interpreting political participation as communicative action: A comparison of younger and older adults. Frontiers in Political Science, 7.
  9. Era. (2020). Ini alasan Gus Dur hingga Soekarno ingin bubarkan DPR. https://era.id/sejarah/39794/ini-alasan-gus-dur-hingga-soekarno-ingin-bubarkan-dpr
  10. Gussela, M. D., Kurniawati, M., N, J. S., Hermanto, D., Fauziansah, S., & Saebani, B. A. (2024). Fenomena “No Viral No Justice” Perspektif Teori Penegakkan Hukum. Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(2), 792–800. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/rrj.v7i2.1326
  11. Herdiansah, A. G., & Sumadinata, W. S. (2019). Indonesia’s political culture in the new digital age: A preliminary discussion. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik, 32(4), 378–389.
  12. Kaltim Post. (2024). Dekrit Gus Dur bangkit lagi, warganet ramai teriak bubarkan DPR demo 25 Agustus. https://kaltimpost.jawapos.com/nasional/2386480063/dekrit-gus-dur-bangkit-lagi-warganet-ramai-teriak-bubarkan-dpr-demo-25-agustus
  13. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika. (2025). [HOAKS] Video Sri Mulyani Sebut Guru Sebagai Beban Negara. Kementerian Komunikasi Dan Informatika. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/berita-hoaks/detail/hoaks-video-sri-mulyani-sebut-guru-sebagai-beban-negara
  14. Kompas. (2024). Siapa di balik ajakan demo bubarkan DPR. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/siapa-di-balik-ajakan-demo-bubarkan-dpr
  15. NasDem DPR RI. (2025, September 1). Partai NasDem nonaktifkan Ahmad Sahroni dan Nafa Urbach dari anggota DPR RI. https://nasdemdprri.id/berita/partai-nasdem-nonaktifkan-ahmad-sahroni-dan-nafa-urbach-dari-anggota-dpr-ri
  16. Octaviani Suryanto, S. ., & Mulyana, A. (2024). Legal Challenges in Overcoming Changes in Social Behaviour Due to the Development of Technology and Information. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 3(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v3i2.359
  17. Ortiz, J., Myers, M. D., & Tripathi, A. K. (2025). Promoting societal development through digital activism : A case study of a Guatemalan tragedy. Journal of Information Technology, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962251380597
  18. Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
  19. Saputra, B. R. (2025). DPR RI Menjawab Tuntutan Rakyat 17+8 dengan Enam Poin Penting. Tugu Malang. https://tugumalang.id/dpr-ri-menjawab-tuntutan-rakyat-178-dengan-enam-poin-penting/
  20. Prasodjo, T. (2025). Public Trust Reloaded: The Impact of Data Transparency and Digital Participation on Government Legitimacy in the Era of Open Government. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 6(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v6i1.1894
  21. Saumer, M., Maikovska, K., Neureiter, A., Scharrel, H. Van, & Matthes, J. (2024). Angry tweets . How uncivil and intolerant elite communication affects political distrust and political participation intentions. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 00(00), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2433760
  22. Sekretariat Jendral DPR RI. (2025). Menjawab Tuntutan 17+8, DPR RI Hentikan Sejumlah Fasilitas Anggota dan Komitmen Transparansi. DPR RI. https://jdih.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/59034
  23. Situmorang, T. P., & Ritonga, A. D. (2025). TikTok and Politics : A Bibliometric Mapping of Research Trends. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i3.7616
  24. Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Emotions and information diffusion in social media—Sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 217–248. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
  25. Szałygin, A. M.-. (2020). Emotions and Civility : Everyday Talks about Politics with Rural Inhabitants of Southern Poland. East European Journal of Society and Politics, 6(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v6i2.642
  26. Tempo. (2019). Sukarno pernah bubarkan DPR 65 tahun lalu. https://www.tempo.co/politik/sukarno-pernah-bubarkan-dpr-65-tahun-lalu-1216337
  27. Tempo. (2024). Ini kejadian yang picu demonstrasi bubarkan DPR. https://www.tempo.co/politik/ini-kejadian-yang-picu-demonstrasi-bubarkan-dpr-2065603
  28. Toumaras, N. (2025). Networked Hyperlocal Activists : Digital Democracy and Engagement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Social Media + Society, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251345945
  29. Utami, P. (2025). The Role of Viral Video in Indonesian Politics. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 19(3), 327–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v19i3.548