Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

One of the sine qua non in modern democracies is the existence of political parties. In the context of the Indonesian state administration, the important role of political parties is emphasized through the provision of important functions by amending the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. To carry out the important functions of political parties, access to money is needed, but in politics the role of money must be regulated to prevent the negative impact of money in democracy. This research is a normative legal research, descriptive-prescriptive in nature, focusing on examining primary and secondary legal materials, using a statutory and conceptual approach.  Since the beginning of the reformation period in the general elections of 1999, 2004, 2009, and 2019, the financial regulation of political parties in Indonesia has followed a prescription model, which is a regulatory model that issues orders and dictates the sources of revenue for political parties but does not regulate or dictate the use of political party funds. Efforts to maximize political parties' financial arrangements in order to ensure their independence and strengthen the principle of accountability begin by reformulating the regulation of funding sources from the state budget by adopting in-kind assistance, such as advertising prior to the general election to all parties participating in the general election.

Keywords

Regulatory Model Finance Political Party Indonesia

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
W.W Mamonto, M. A. ., & Gani, A. W. . (2022). Model of Political Party Financial Regulation in Post-Reformation Indonesia . Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 1(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v1i2.181
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abd Rahman Mazawi, (2017). Dinamika Partai Politik dalam Sistem Presidensil di Indonesia, Jurnal Agama dan Hak Azasi Manusia, Volume 4, Nomor 2.
  2. Aliyu Mukhtar Katsina, (2014). Party Politics and Party Laws in New Democracies : The Case of Nigeria in the Fourth Republic, 1999-2011,” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Volume 4, Number 2. 142–52.
  3. André Kaiser et al., (2002). The Democratic Quality of Institutional Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Political Studies. 50(2). 313-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.t01-1-00372
  4. Anika Gauja. (2011). Comparative Gatekeeper Provisions in Party and Electoral Law: Sustaining the Cartel?. Working paper Series on the Legal Regulation of Political Parties. No. 11. http://www.partylaw.leidenuniv.nl/uploads/wp1011.pdf
  5. Alejandro Poire. (2006). Elements for a Theory of Political Finance. KSG Working Paper No. RWP06-014
  6. Fernando Casal-bértoa, Piccio, and Rashkova. (2012). “Party Law in Comparative Perspective.” Working Paper Series on the Legal Regulation of Political Parties No. 16. http://www.partylaw.leidenuniv.nl/uploads/wp1612.pdf
  7. Fernando Casal-Bertoaa, Piccio, Daniela, Romee, Raskhova, dan Ekaterina. (2012). Party Law in Comparative Perspective, Working Paper Series on the Legal Regulation of Political Parties, No. 16. http://www.partylaw.leidenuniv.nl/uploads/wp1612.pdf
  8. Fernando Casal Bertoa, Kevin Deegan-Karuse and Peter Ucen. (2014). Limits of Regulation: Party Law and Finance in Slovakia 1990-2012. East European Politics. 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2014.933412
  9. Fransje Molenaar. (2014). Legitimising Political Party Representation: Party Law Development in Latin America,” International Political Science Review Volume 35, Nomor 3. 324–38,
  10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114526763
  11. Fadhil, M. The Harmonization of Wiretapping Regulations in Indonesia: Law Enforcement Perspective. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v3i2.75
  12. Gani, A. W. (2016). Hermeneutika Sebagai Metode Penemuan Hukum Yang Progresif. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), Volume 2, Nomor 1.
  13. Harold J Laski. (1925). Grammar of Politics, Yale University Press, Yale.
  14. Ingrid Van Biezen. (2004). “Political Parties as Public Utilities,” Party Politics 10, No. 6. 701–22.
  15. Joel W Johnson. (2008). Democracy and Disclosure: Electorla System and the Regulation of Political Finance. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Democracy. 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2008.0007
  16. Kenneth Janda. (2005). Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Adopting Party Law, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
  17. Kenneth Janda. (2006). “How Nations Govern Political Parties,” Prepared for the 20th World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Fukuoka, Japan.
  18. Lauri Karvonen. (2007). Legislation on Political Parteis: A Global Comparison. Party Politic. Volume 13, Number. 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807077955
  19. Magnus Ohman (Ed). (2013). Controlling Money in Politics: An Introduction, International Foundation for Electoral System. Washington DC. https://ifes.org/sites/default/files/a_brief_introduction_to_money_in_politics_final_magnus_ohman.pdf
  20. Moch Andry W W Mamonto. (2019). Legal Politics of Simplifying Political Parties in Indonesia, Substantive Justice International Journal of law, Volume 2, Nomor 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i1.25
  21. Office of Democracy and Governance. (2003). Money in Politics Handbook: A Guide To Increasing Transparency in Emerging Democracies. Technical Publication Series. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington., hlm. 5.
  22. Richard S Katz and William J Crotty (Ed). (2006). Handbook of Party Politics. Sage Publications Inc. California.
  23. Sekar Anggun Gading Pinilih. (2017). Mendorong Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pengaturan Keuangan Partai Politik, Mimbar Hukum, Volume 29, Nomor 1.https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.17647
  24. Sigit Pamungkas, 2011, Partai Politik Teori dan Praktik di Indonesia, Instituet for Democracy and Welfarism, Yogyakarta.
  25. Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  26. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1999 tentang Partai Politik
  27. Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2002 tentang Partai Politik
  28. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik
  29. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik