Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the basis for the application of criminal law to the crime of murder that occurred in Wajo Regency and to find out the judge's considerations in making a decision on case Number 156/Pid.B/2020/PN.Sengkang through legal principles and legal norms that were taken into consideration. The research method that uses this case approach shows in the results of the study that the application of material punishment for the offense of murder is in accordance with applicable legal norms, all elements of criminal acts regulated in the applicable regulations in Indonesia have been met in which the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 14 (fourteen) years. twelve) years. The judge's legal considerations for the murder offense in the case were in accordance with the elements proven in the trial, so that the panel of judges based on the facts at trial judged that the defendant could be held accountable for his actions with the consideration that at the time he committed his actions the defendant was aware of the consequences and did not prevent him from doing so. the intention is that the perpetrator in carrying out his actions is in good health and capable of considering elements against the law, and there is no reason for the abolition of the crime.

Keywords

judge analysisi public legal analysis murder offices

Article Details

How to Cite
Assaad, A. I., Mursyid, M., & Setyaningsih, S. (2021). Judge’s Legal Analysis of Murder Offices. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review, 1(1), 01–06. https://doi.org/10.52970/grlspr.v1i1.116

References

  1. Agustini, N. K. S. K., & Purwanti, N. P. (2016). Analisis Unsur-Unsur Pasal 340 Kuhp Tentang Pembunuhan Berencanapada Kasus Pembunuhan Tragis Anggota Ormas Di Bali. Universitas Udayana, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  2. A Aswari, S Salle (2018). Serangkai Potensi Aksi Tawuran Antar Siswa, Prosiding Seminar Nasional STKIP Andi Matappa Pangkep 1 (1), 192-199
  3. Arief, B. N. (2018). Masalah Penegakan Hukum Dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penanggulangan (Cetakan ke). Kencana. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=AeLJDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Masalah+Penegakan+Hukum+dan+Kebijakan+Hukum+Pidana+Dalam+Penanggulangan&ots=kNBQB6yR3i&sig=wWpRXIO88WraG7NIuulju7Vj_bY&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijaka
  4. Asshiddiqie, J. (2015). The Rule Of Law di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jimly.Com. http://www.jimly.com/makalah/namafile/177/THE_RULE_OF_LAW.pdf
  5. Farahwati, F. (2018). Pembuktian Memegang Peranan Penting dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Sidang Peradilan Pidana. Legalitas, 3(1), 19. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.31293/lg.v3i1.3673
  6. Fernando, Z. J. (2001). Due Process of Law Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Di Indonesia. 21(1), 67–89. https://journals.unihaz.ac.id/index.php/keadilan/article/view/2017/1017
  7. Hajairin, H. (2017). Konstruksi Hukum Dalam Pembuktian Unsur Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah Dan Hukum, 1(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.52266/sangaji.v1i1.67
  8. Hananta, D. (2018). Pertimbangan Keadaan-Keadaan Meringankan Dan Memberatkan Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana / Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances Consideration on Sentencing. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.1.2018.87-108
  9. Hasaziduhu Moho. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Menurut Aspek Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, dan Kemanfaatan. Universitas Dharmawangsa, 13(1), 138–149. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i59.349
  10. Lilik Mulyadi. (2012). Penelitian Asas, Teori, Norma dan Praktik Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 311–337. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.2.2012.311-337
  11. Marentek, J. I. (2019). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau Dari Pasal 340 Kuhp. Lex Crimen, 8(11), 88–95. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/27953/27431
  12. Miharja, M. (2019). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Qiara Media.
  13. Nawi, S., Syarif, M., Hambali, A. R., & Salle, S. (2019). Understanding to Intergroup Conflict: Social Harmonization and Law Awareness of Society. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 2(2), 137. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v2i2.45
  14. Pieter, S., & Silambi, E. D. (2019). Pembuktian dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Ditinjau dari Kitab Udang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Restorative Justice, 3(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.35724/jrj.v3i1.1940
  15. Ridwan, R. (2020). Pemanfaatan Hasil Rekam Sidang Korupsi untuk Menghasilkan Putusan Berkeadilan. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 22(1), 149–162. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i1.14621
  16. Rochaeti, N., & Dwi Sutanti, R. (2018). Kontribusi Peradilan Adat dan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214
  17. Rogahang, M. (2012). Suatu Study Tentang Akibat Hukum Dari Surat Dakwaan Kabur Dalam Perkara Pidana. Lex Crimen, 1(4), 111–123. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/905/720
  18. Rusyadi, I. (2016). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Hukum PRIORIS, 5(2), 128–134. https://trijurnal.lemlit.trisakti.ac.id/prioris/article/view/558
  19. Simatupang, N., & Faisal. (2017). Kriminologi: Suatu Pengantar. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. Pustaka Prima. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/15406
  20. Sodiqin, A. (2015). Restorative Justice dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan: Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Asy-Syir’ah, 49(1), 63–100. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.14421/asy-syir’ah.2015.%25x
  21. Suardana, I. W. (2014). Hukuman Mati dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Suatu Kajian Kritis. 2(1), 126–138. https://ejournal.unipas.ac.id/index.php/KW/article/view/433
  22. Waskita, Y., & Widiyanti, N. (2007). Kejahatan dalam Masyarakat dan Pencegahannya. PT. Bina Aksara.