Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Kirkpatrick training model in leadership training for supervisors in the Sarolangun Regency Government. The study compares the effectiveness of supervisor leadership training conducted using classical methods and blended learning methods. A quantitative comparative research method is employed. The study's population comprises 80 individuals for training evaluation at levels 1 and 2, and 160 individuals for training evaluation at levels 3 and 4. Primary and secondary data sources are utilized. Data collection techniques include interviews, questionnaires, and documentation. The Likert scale measurement is conducted using Microsoft Excel, and hypothesis testing is performed using SPSS 26.0 software. The results indicate that the evaluation using the Kirkpatrick model between blended learning and classical methods obtained a P value (0.523 > 0.05), indicating that Ho is accepted and Ha is rejected. This means there is no significant difference in the Kirkpatrick model evaluation results between training using blended learning methods and classical methods.

Keywords

Blended Learning Classical Kirkpatrick Method Training

Article Details

How to Cite
Sulistiyono, A., Ginting, G. ., & Khalid, I. . (2024). Evaluation of Training Effectiveness of Kirkpatrick Model on Blended Learning and Classical Training in Sarolangun District Government. Golden Ratio of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.52970/grhrm.v5i1.539

References

  1. Akhmadi, A. (2021). Implementation of Blended Learning in Training. Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan, 78-87.
  2. Annisa, B. S. (2022). Efektivitas Blended Learning Pada Pelatihan Dasar Calon Pegawai Negeri Sipil (CPNS) di Badan Kepegawaian Pengembangan dan Sumber Daya Manusia Kota Solok Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, 1-13.
  3. Arifin, Z. (2017). Evaluasi Pembelajaran: Prinsip-Teknik-Prosedur, Cetakan ke10. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  4. Arwin, Anita, Helsa, Konedi, & Fransyaigu. (2022). Pelatihan Penerapan Pembelajaran Blended learning untuk Guru Sekolah Dasar. Dedication: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 111-120.
  5. Astuti, N. P., & Bakri, R. (2022). Pelatihan Learning Management System (LMS) Untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Blended Learning Pada Praktikum Perbankan Bagi Dosen dan Mahasiswa . LOSARI: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 41-45.
  6. Falah, M. M. (2023). Menimbang Efektifitas Pelatihan Model Blended Learning Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Diklat Keagamaan , 1-11.
  7. Gita et al. (2020). Inovasi pembelajaran biologi di era revolusi industri 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi, 58-66.
  8. Gunawan. (2020). Fungsi Media Pembelajaran Menggunakan Metode Distance Learning Pelatihan Kepemimpinan Administrator. Tawshiyah, 1-19.
  9. Hasan, M. Iqbal, (2002). Pokok-pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya. Bogor: Ghalia.
  10. Kirkpatrick, D., L. & Kirkpatrick J., D. (2008). Evaluating Training Program The Four Levels. San Fransisco : Berret-Kohler Publisher, Inc.
  11. Ramdan, D. (2023). Implementasi Metode Blended Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Tenaga Kesehatan Akupresur. Jawa Barat: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
  12. Rinni Rodiah Munajatisari (2014) Efektivitas Metode Pelatihan Klasikal dan E-Learning. Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Volume 10, Nomor 2, Tahun 2014
  13. Tyas, M. P. (2022). Pengaruh Pelatihan, Motivasi Berprestasi dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Pada PT. PAL Indonesia (Persero). Surabaya: Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya.
  14. Tofan, M. (2021). Menyusun Program Pelatihan Bagi Karyawan. OPTIMAL: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 25-35.
  15. Savsavubun, F. F., & Ohoiwutun, B. (2023). Revolusi Industri 4.0 Menurut Klaus Schwab: Dampak dan Tantangannya Bagi Kehidupan Manusia Dewasa Ini. Seri Mitra Refleksi Ilmiah-Pastoral, 137-150.
  16. Widiyono, Aan. (2020). Efektifitas Perkuliahan Daring (online) pada Mahasiswa PGSD di Saat Pandemi Covid 19. Jurnal Pendidikan. Vol. 8, No. 2, Tahun 2020.