Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the impact of visual marketing elements on consumer purchasing behavior within the fashion e-commerce industry, focusing on visual aesthetics, user-generated content (UGC), and influencer endorsements. Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 participants to capture in-depth insights into how visual cues shape consumer perceptions, build trust, and influence purchase intentions. Thematic analysis of the data revealed three main findings: high-quality visuals evoke emotional responses that increase product appeal, UGC serves as a crucial factor in establishing trust and reducing purchase hesitation, and influencer endorsements significantly impact consumer decision-making by adding perceived value and trend relevance. These findings contribute to existing theories, such as the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model, by illustrating the diverse ways in which visual stimuli influence consumer behavior on emotional, social, and practical levels. Managerial implications include the strategic use of high-quality visuals, encouragement of UGC, and selection of authentic influencers to enhance consumer engagement and conversion. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of how visual marketing shapes consumer behavior in fashion e-commerce, offering valuable insights for both academic research and practical applications in the digital marketplace.

Keywords

Visual Marketing E-Commerce Consumer Behavior User-Generated Content Influencer Marketing

Article Details

How to Cite
Marwan, A. ., Harkim, H., & Sugiharto, B. . (2024). The Impact of Visual Marketing on Purchasing Behavior in E-Commerce: A Case Study in The Fashion Industry. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 4(2), 1022–1031. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v4i2.769

References

  1. Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X16665177
  2. Agnihotri, R., Dingus, R., Hu, M. Y., & Krush, M. T. (2020). Social media: Influencing customer satisfaction in B2B sales. Industrial Marketing Management, 53, 172-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.09.003
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  4. Chen, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Pan, Z. (2017). How do product recommendations affect impulse buying? Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 29(2), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.2017040103
  5. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
  6. Daugherty, T., Eastin, M. S., & Bright, L. (2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722139
  7. Huang, J., Lee, S. H., & Kim, J. (2021). The impact of visual content on purchasing decisions in e-commerce fashion industry. Fashion and Textile Research Journal, 22(3), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.5850/JFT.2021.22.3.271
  8. Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C. Y., & Chua, W. S. (2019). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 63(9-10), 1057-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.013
  9. Karhade, P. P., & Dong, J. Q. (2021). Innovation outcomes of digitally enabled collaborative problemistic search capability. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 45(2), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/12202
  10. Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480-1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014
  11. Kim, M., & Lennon, S. J. (2008). The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping. Psychology & Marketing, 25(2), 146-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20204
  12. Kirana, A. Y., Saifudin, M., Mukhlisin, M. M., Fatmawati, N., & Ansori, M. I. (2023). Transformasi Digital terhadap Sumber Daya Manusia sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kapabilitas Perusahaan. Digital Bisnis: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen Dan E-Commerce, 2(4), 19–36.
  13. McCormick, H., & Livett, C. (2012). Analysing the influence of the presentation of fashion garments on young consumers' online behavior. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 16(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211203014
  14. Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press. Multivariate Data Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119409137.ch4
  15. Muttaqin, I. (2023). The Effect Of Digital Innovation, Fintech And Sustainability Report On The Financial Performance Of Tegal City Smes. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(03), 561–573.
  16. Pandey, A., & Sihag, K. (2020). Role of visual marketing in e-commerce fashion industry: A study of Instagram influencers. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 14(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v14i1.2755
  17. Park, J., Lee, D., & Han, S. (2007). The effect of online visual presentation on consumers’ perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.11.002
  18. Pentina, I., & Taylor, D. G. (2020). Exploring the role of socially constructed virtual communities on brand equity creation. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 5(2), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v5i2.2998
  19. Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6),821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
  20. Rizal, A., Kahfi, S. N., Abdurrahman, A., Wulandono, W., & Tono, T. (2023). Manajemen Perubahan Di Era Digital : Tantangan Dan Peluang Bagi Adaptasi Organisasi. BULLET : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 2(4), 933–941.
  21. Sousa-Zomer, T. T., Neely, A., & Martinez, V. (2020). Digital transforming capability and performance: a microfoundational perspective. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 40(7–8), 1095–1128. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2019-0444
  22. Strazzullo, S., Mauriello, R., Corvello, V., Cricelli, L., & Grimaldi, M. (2023). How open innovation can improve companies’ corporate social responsibility performance? Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, February, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12535
  23. Syamil, A., Danial, D. M., Saori, S., Waty, E., Fahmi, M. A., & Hartati, V. (2023). Buku Ajar Manajemen Rantai Pasok (Efitra & Sepriano (ed.); Issue August). PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia Redaksi.
  24. Tan, A. W., Elshaday, N., Ambouw, B., & Kustiwi, I. A. (2024). Digitalisasi Ekonomi SIA : Transformasi Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi Dan Inovasi Bisnis. Jurnal Mutiara Ilmu Akuntansi (JUMIA), 2(2), 332–341.
  25. Vigren, O., Kadefors, A., & Eriksson, K. (2022). Digitalization, innovation capabilities and absorptive capacity in the Swedish real estate ecosystem. Facilities, 40(15–16), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-07-2020-0083
  26. Yang, Y., Chen, N., & Chen, H. (2023). The Digital Platform, Enterprise Digital Transformation, and Enterprise Performance of Cross-Border E-Commerce—From the Perspective of Digital Transformation and Data Elements. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 18(2), 777–794. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer18020040
  27. Zhang, Y., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.001

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.