Main Article Content

Abstract

Islamic Studies has often been narrowly understood as a theological and normative field of study centered on sacred texts and religious law. However, as a social phenomenon embedded in society, Islam also manifests as a cultural reality that interacts dialectically with local contexts, historical developments, and the everyday practices of its followers. This article aims to critically examine Islam as a dual object of study: as a religion, representing its normative-theological dimension, and as a culture, representing its historical-empirical dimension. This study employs a qualitative approach using library research and content analysis of contemporary academic literature on Islamic studies methodologies. The findings indicate that the normative and cultural approaches are not opposing perspectives but rather complementary dimensions for understanding Islam comprehensively (kaffah). An integrative-interconnective approach enables researchers to examine Islam not only as a fixed body of doctrine but also as a living practice (Living Islam) that continuously interacts and negotiates with local cultures, as demonstrated by the phenomenon of Nusantara Islam. This article concludes that contemporary Islamic studies require a multidisciplinary framework that integrates classical Islamic sciences with the social sciences and humanities to capture the complexity of Islam as both a religion and a culture.

Keywords

Islamic Studies Religion Culture Interdisciplinary Approach Nusantara Islam

Article Details

How to Cite
Muslim, M. H., Giling, M., & Malaka, M. (2026). Islamic Studies as an Object of Religious and Cultural Studies. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 6(4), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v6i4.2533

References

  1. Abdullah, M. A. (2006). Islamic studies di perguruan tinggi: Pendekatan integratif-interkonektif. Pustaka Pelajar.
  2. Abdullah, M. A. (2020). Multidisiplin, interdisiplin, dan transdisiplin ilmu pengetahuan dan riset pada pendidikan tinggi masa depan. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam Dan Sains, 2, xiii–xiii.
  3. Alim, A., & Arifi, A. (2026). Menjembatani Normativitas dan Historisitas: Peran Vital Pendekatan Sosiologis dalam Studi Islam. Al-Ilmiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(4), 966–973.
  4. Arkoun, M. (2002). The unthought in contemporary Islamic thought. Saqi Books London.
  5. Azra, A., & Hasan, I. R. (2002). Islam Nusantara: Jaringan global dan lokal. (No Title).
  6. Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Eriyanto, A. I. (2011). Pengantar Metodologi untuk Penelitian Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Cet. I,(Jakarta: Kencana, 2011).
  8. Esposito, J. L., & Maftuhin, A. (2010). Islam the straight path: ragam ekspresi menuju" jalan lurus"(al-shirat al-mustaqim). Dian Rakyat.
  9. Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Hefner, R. W. (2011). Civil islam: Muslims and democratization in indonesia. In Civil Islam. Princeton University Press.
  11. Ishom Fuadi Fikri. (2016). Universitas Islam dan Lokalitas BUdaya Dalam BIngkai Islam Nusantara. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 46–55.
  12. Kersten, C. (2019). Contemporary thought in the Muslim world: Trends, themes, and issues. Routledge.
  13. Kuntowijoyo. (2007). Islam sebagai ilmu: epistemologi, metodologi, dan etika (Ed. 2, Cet. 1). Tiara Wacana.
  14. Rahman, F. (2017). Islam & modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition (Vol. 15). University of Chicago Press.
  15. Ricklefs, M. C. (2007). Polarising Javanese society: Islamic and other visions, c. 1830-1930. nus Press.
  16. Saefullah, A. S. (2024). Ragam penelitian kualitatif berbasis kepustakaan pada studi agama dan keberagamaan dalam islam. Al-Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 2(4), 195–211.
  17. Van Bruinessen, M. (2013). Contemporary developments in Indonesian Islam: Explaining the" conservative turn". Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  18. Waardenburg, J. (1999). Muslim perceptions of other religions: a historical survey. Oxford University Press.
  19. Woodward, M. (2010). Java, Indonesia and Islam (Vol. 3). Springer Science & Business Media.
  20. Zed, M. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.