Article Sidebar

Download
Download Article

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research examines the influence of fair value measurement on audit fees and the moderating role of auditor industry specialization. The study covers all firms listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, from which 955 entities were screened, and 45 firms meeting the criteria were selected using purposive sampling. A total of 135 firm-year observations were analyzed using the Random Effects Model (REM) in EViews. The findings indicate that fair value measurement is associated with higher audit fees due to greater estimation uncertainty and more intensive audit procedures, especially for complex valuation levels. Auditor industry specialization, measured through both market-based and portfolio-based indicators, also plays a significant role and strengthens the effect of fair value measurement on audit fees. The study highlights that specialized auditors respond differently depending on their experience and portfolio, intensifying the impact of fair value practices. Addressing limited evidence from emerging markets, this research clarifies how valuation complexity interacts with auditor expertise in shaping audit pricing. Practical implications arise for auditors, firms, and regulators in planning and transparency.

Keywords

Fair Value Audit Fees Auditor Industry Specialization

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rahmawati, A., Ahzar, F. A., Wardhani, M. K., & Aligarh, F. (2026). Fair Value and Audit Fees: The Moderating Effect of Auditor Industry Specialization in IDX-Listed Financial Firms. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 6(2), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.52970/grar.v6i2.1723
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abdelmunim, E. (2021). The Impact of Fair Value Disclosure on Audit Fees of Jordanian Listed Firms. May.
  2. Alharasis, E. E., Alidarous, M., & Jamaani, F. (2023). Auditor industry expertise and external audit prices: empirical evidence from Amman Stock Exchange-listed companies. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-02-2022-0051
  3. Alharasis, E. E., Prokofieva, M., & Clark, C. (2023). The moderating impact of auditor industry specialisation on the relationship between fair value disclosure and audit fees: empirical evidence from Jordan. Asian Review of Accounting, 31(2), 227–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-03-2022-0050
  4. Andayani, W., & Sutrisno, T. (2024). Biological Asset Accounting Implementation Based on Psak No. 69. 6798, 10187–10202.
  5. Arwani, A., Ramadhan, M. N., & Restiara, V. (2020). Managerial Ownership in Agency Theory. At-Tijarah, 7(1), 1–33. http://repository.iainpekalongan.ac.id/id/eprint/269
  6. Attar, N. (2021). Negin Attar PCAOB-type Regulation and Audit Portfolio Doctoral Thesis. March.
  7. Azahra, F., & Wardhani, M. K. (2024). The Role of Market Share and Portfolio Share-Based Auditor Specialization on Audit Fees. 2003, 533–538.
  8. Bratten, B., Causholli, M., & Omer, T. C. (2019). Audit Firm Tenure, Bank Complexity, and Financial Reporting Quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12427
  9. Fauziah, K., & Dwinda Yanthi, M. (2021). The Effect of Audit Fee, Independence, Auditor Experience, and Auditor Competence on Audit Quality (A Case Study of Public Accounting Firms in East Java). Jae (Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi), 6(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.29407/jae.v6i2.15992
  10. G. Sembiring, B. (2021). Current Practices and Challenges in Fair Value Auditing. ABIS: Accounting and Business Information Systems Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22146/abis.v9i1.64281
  11. Gah, A. D. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of Audit Fees Determinants: Evidence from an Emerging Market. Iranian Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22067/ijaaf.2020.39255
  12. Ghofananda, V. N., & Mita, A. F. (2023). The Role of the Audit Committee in the Relationship Between Fair Value Methods and Audit Fees: A Case Study in ASEAN. Apssai Accounting Review, 3(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.26418/apssai.v3i1.72
  13. Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2021). Multivariate Analysis and Econometrics: Theory, Concepts, and Applications of EViews 10 (pp. 1–232).
  14. Griffith, E. E. (2016). Auditors, Specialists, and Professional Jurisdiction in Audits of Fair Values.
  15. Guo, Q., Koch, C., & Zhu, A. (2022). The Value of Auditor Industry Specialization: Evidence from a Structural Model. Accounting Review, 97(7), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2020-0525
  16. Hatem, G., Zeidan, J., Goossens, M., & Moreira, C. (2022). Normality Testing Methods and the Importance of Skewness and Kurtosis in Statistical Analysis. BAU Journal - Science and Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.54729/ktpe9512
  17. Iqbal, M. (2015). Panel Data Regression (2): "The Stage of Analysis." 2, 1–7.
  18. Khomsatun, S. (2016). The Implementation of Fair Value Measurement under PSAK–IFRS Convergence and Its Impact on Accounting Policy Choices in Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(2), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v4i2.4031
  19. Kumar, A., Mallick, S., & Sinha, A. (2021). Is uncertainty the same everywhere? Advanced versus emerging economies. Economic Modelling, 101, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105524
  20. Matthew, G., Owusu, Y., & Amoah, R. (2019). Determinants of audit fees : The perception of external auditors. 1(4), 44–54.
  21. Michas, P. N., Russomanno, D., & Zhao, M. (2025). The opportunity for partner industry knowledge sharing within audit offices and audit quality. In Review of Accounting Studies (Vol. 30, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-025-09872-w
  22. Nandita, D. A., Alamsyah, L. B., Jati, E. P., & Widodo, E. (2019). Panel Data Regression to Identify the Factors Affecting GRDP in Yogyakarta Province (2011-2015). 2(1), 42–52.
  23. Nurhikmah, A. H., & Sisdianto, E. (2024). The Role of Accountants in Building Public Trust in Financial Statements: An Ethical Perspective. Jma), 2(11), 3031–5220.
  24. Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467
  25. Paquot, M., & Larsson, T. (2024). Descriptive Statistics and Visualization with R Descriptive Statistics and Visualization. January 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1
  26. Policy, K., & Oecd, I. (2023). Indonesia 2020. In 2020, Orange Book of Results - Volume 3. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210057738c063
  27. Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2013). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods (BetaAlfa (ed.); Alfabeta). Alfabeta, CV.
  28. Salehi, M., Fakhri Mahmoudi, M. R., & Daemi Gah, A. (2019). A meta-analysis approach for determinants of effective factors on audit quality: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(2), 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-03-2018-0025
  29. Sihombing, P. R., & Indonesia, S. (2021). Panel Data Regression Analysis. December.
  30. Susanti, M., Ardana, I. C., & Dewi, S. P. (2021). The Impact of IFRS 16 ( PSAK 73 ) Implementation on Key Financial Ratios : Evidence from Indonesia. 174(Icebm, 2020), 295–303.
  31. Taylor, M. H., Glover, S. M., & Taylor, M. H. (2020). Implications for Auditing Standards and the Academy. January. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51514
  32. Xiao, J. (2021). The value of auditing, audit independence, and audit pricing : A review of empirical evidence from China. 1. October. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1970703